Posts Tagged ‘first time home buyer tax credit’

Why you should always send your tax return with delivery confirmation!

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

As I have mentioned in previous blogs, I am waiting for the IRS to process our income tax return. I do believe I also mentioned the importance of always sending any correspondence to the IRS with delivery confirmation from the post office. Having had past experience with the IRS putting false delivery dates on mailed items, I KNOW how important this is.

I just wanted to tell you that… sure enough… they are falsely dating my documents again. I sent our tax return via Express Mail with delivery confirmation and signature required. My delivery confirmation shows it was delivered and signed by the IRS on 4/7/2010. I just got off the phone with them and they are trying to tell me that it was delivered 4/28/10. That is a whole THREE weeks later!!! Of course, the lady I spoke with wasn’t helpful at all. She just kept telling me there is nothing I can do about it. BS!!! She then told me to write a complaint to the office that received my return.

This is ridiculous. That is the IRS for you, trying to be sneaky and buy themselves more time to delay. For anyone who doesn’t know, these dates are very important if you want anything done in a timely manner.  The IRS employees have time frames to abide by.  I am being told I have to wait 8 weeks from the date they “received” it for them to process it.  So they conveniently tack on an extra 3 weeks saying my return didn’t arrive when it really did.

So, here we go.  Yet another reason why you have to stay on top of the IRS at all times.  And had I not called and questioned them repeatedly about my refund status, I never would have known they put the wrong delivery date in.  Don’t trust the IRS people!!

How the IRS Offer In Compromise effects the First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

I have run into quite the dilemma!  If you have been following my blog, then you know that I had my IRS Offer In Compromise accepted in 2009.  When you have an OIC accepted, you must agree to let the IRS take any tax refund you are entitled to for the year the OIC is accepted.  So for me, any refund I am owed for 2009 will be kept by the IRS. 

 The tax debt I owed on was acquired prior to myself being married and was a very long time ago.  So my husband is considered an “injured spouse” in IRS terms and none of his refund is ever taken to pay my tax debts.  So we know with certainty that his income tax refund will go to him and not be used to pay my old tax debts even though we file jointly (we did this last year too).

My issue here is that my husband is buying our first house this year.  It’s going to be in his name only, not mine.  So he will be be getting the first time home buyer tax credit.  If he files taxes separate, he only gets $4k for the credit.  If he files jointly with me, then he gets the full $8k credit.  Which makes it seem like me being added to the taxes involves doubling the credit… which would make it seem like 50% of the credit is considered mine.  My concern is that the IRS will take that additional $4k (50%) as if it were my half and apply it to my old tax debt. 

Now I have looked all over the Internet for information on how the two work together, but there is NOTHING that I could find.  So I called the OIC department and asked the lady who accepted my OIC.  She told me she “believes” that the IRS will not take any of the first time home buyer tax credit to pay my back taxes per my OIC agreement.  She was not 100% sure of that though.  I told her I wanted a firm answer and something in writing.  She refered me to the IRS Tax Law department.  The woman there said the same thing… that she was pretty sure they wouldn’t take that money from us… but she wasn’t 100% sure.  She refered me to the Injured Spouse department.  The guy there explained that the there is no set rule designating where those funds must be allocated in any certain situation.  That the IRS will apply them however we say to on the Injured Spouse form we must fill out.  So basicly, my husband has to put that the whole $8k is supposed to go to him.  This IRS guy could not give me any documentation to support this and I didn’t feel very confident about what he was saying.  I can just see them saying that, we fill out the form saying the money goes to my husband, and then they say “no… it doesn’t work that way”… and they take the $4k from us.

We really need the money now.  Being that we have to borrow against it in order to get our house.  But at this point feel like if we file for it on our 2009 taxes that we are taking a huge risk of losing 50% of the credit to the IRS.  We can always wait until 2010 tax filing to claim the credit in full, but that will make things hard on us as we would have to come up with the money to pay back the loans for our purchase expenses. 

Does anyone out there have any firm information on this situation?  It would be greatly appreciated.

Latest News: Extension of 2009 First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit Incentive

Saturday, October 31st, 2009

It’s the latest news!  The senate has come up with a deal to extend the 2009 first time home buyer tax credit incentive into 2010!  It’s not official yet… but I say “yet” because it looks very promising.  You know how it goes, it may get warped and manipulated into something else along the way, but this is the latest news on the first time home buyer tax credit…

The initial plans are to extend the expiration date and slightly modify how it works.  Instead of the first time home buyer tax incentive expiring on November 30th as expected, you will now have to have a signed purchase contract by April 30th, 2010.  So, you must be IN CONTRACT by April 30th, 2010.  Then they are allowing an additional 60 days to complete the sale and close no later then July 1st, 2010. 

I personally am very grateful for this extension.  My husband and I have been scrambling trying to help my parents find a buyer for this home we live in (their house) and let me tell you… we are running out of time.  I was going to be extremely disappointed if we missed out on this tax credit.  Now I feel a bit more relieved and not so much pressure.

In addition, there are talks of another perk to be worked into the first time home byer tax credit that would benefit sellers.  The credit will now offer a $6,500 tax credit to home owners who sell their primary residence that they owned for at least 5 consequtive years in the past 8 years.

The income limits will also be raised.  Individual from $75,000 to $125,000 and couples from $150,000 to $250,000.

Other people are saying that the increase in income may be too generous… giving a helping hand to those who really do not need it.  On one hand, I agree with that.  I feel like this government money should only be used to help those in need, not those who make enough money that they could clearly adapt to whatever income problem they might have because of the economy.  On the other hand, there are people who have had sudden income changes because of the economy and even those who were well off, are now stuck in homes about to go into foreclosure.  Maybe this well help them avoid the foreclosure?  I also suppose if it gets more movement into the housing market and more money flowing, it may be of some help to the economy… and therfor… everyone.

All in all, my husband and I are very pleased to hear about this extension.  Now it’s just a matter of them making it official.  Hopefully they do.